Website Editor • November 15, 2016

Fertility Decisions for the Upcoming Growing Season

One well known concept in crop fertility is Liebig's Law of the Minimum. It suggests that production is not limited by the total amount of fertility available, but instead, it is limited by the scarcest resource, or nutrient.  With commodity prices trending low, farmers are circling the wagons and preparing to get through the coming year.  In many cases fertility decisions are being delayed and the mindset of using just the minimum fertilizer is rampant.  Does this concept make sense? If you would get the same yield as you would get from precision fertilization, then – yes, the concept would make sense, simply because the cost of production must be controlled.  In reality – the answer is no!  The task of feeding our crops so that they perform to the optimum economic production level is quite complicated.  Simply ignoring required nutrient needs allows the scarcest nutrient law to sneak in and limit production. All crops need 17 nutrients to survive. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are obviously the largest contributors. However, micronutrients play important supporting roles, and quite often, it is a micronutrient that is limiting production potential.  Micronutrients such as Zinc, Manganese, Copper, and Iron are often limited in soils because of pH.  Others such as Boron may be limited because of leaching. Since wheat is the only traditional crop growing right now, I will use it as an example.  A 100 bushel yield will remove about 0.5 lbs. of micronutrients and total uptake is less than 2 lbs.  It is easy to see that a small amount of fertility could remove some prospective yield barriers.  With such a small amount of fertility required, providing micronutrients to the growing crop doesn’t have to be difficult or expensive.  In fact, trials often yield 4-8% increases in yield with a simple foliar application of NACHURS Finish Line. Because of the varied chemistry and quality in the marketplace, choosing the correct source and application method for micronutrients is critical.  Numerous research plots conducted over the past couple of years with NACHURS products can demonstrate the yield potential of various foliar, broadcast, and in-furrow applications.  It is understood that crop inputs must be kept to a reasonable level this year.  Remember to consider the most limiting nutrients in addition to the amount of NP and K being applied.

One well known concept in crop fertility is Liebig's Law of the Minimum. It suggests that production is not limited by the total amount of fertility available, but instead, it is limited by the scarcest resource, or nutrient.  With commodity prices trending low, farmers are circling the wagons and preparing to get through the coming year.  In many cases fertility decisions are being delayed and the mindset of using just the minimum fertilizer is rampant.  Does this concept make sense?

If you would get the same yield as you would get from precision fertilization, then – yes, the concept would make sense, simply because the cost of production must be controlled.  In reality – the answer is no!  The task of feeding our crops so that they perform to the optimum economic production level is quite complicated.  Simply ignoring required nutrient needs allows the scarcest nutrient law to sneak in and limit production.

All crops need 17 nutrients to survive. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are obviously the largest contributors. However, micronutrients play important supporting roles, and quite often, it is a micronutrient that is limiting production potential.  Micronutrients such as Zinc, Manganese, Copper, and Iron are often limited in soils because of pH.  Others such as Boron may be limited because of leaching.

Since wheat is the only traditional crop growing right now, I will use it as an example.  A 100 bushel yield will remove about 0.5 lbs. of micronutrients and total uptake is less than 2 lbs.  It is easy to see that a small amount of fertility could remove some prospective yield barriers.  With such a small amount of fertility required, providing micronutrients to the growing crop doesn’t have to be difficult or expensive.  In fact, trials often yield 4-8% increases in yield with a simple foliar application of NACHURS Finish Line.

Because of the varied chemistry and quality in the marketplace, choosing the correct source and application method for micronutrients is critical.  Numerous research plots conducted over the past couple of years with NACHURS products can demonstrate the yield potential of various foliar, broadcast, and in-furrow applications.  It is understood that crop inputs must be kept to a reasonable level this year.  Remember to consider the most limiting nutrients in addition to the amount of NP and K being applied.


ad
By SMcQueen June 1, 2026
By Steve McQueen, Agronomy Manager, Nachurs Alpine Solutions.
Balancing Nutrient Efficiency
By Steve McQueen April 2, 2026
When costs tighten, fertilizer decisions often shift toward reducing spend instead of protecting nutrient efficiency.
May 13, 2025
What importance does potassium and sulfur have on the plant?
March 3, 2025
The Crucial Role of Boron in Plants
By emily.bookless February 6, 2025
February 6, 2025 
September 18, 2024
The benefits of maximizing potassium efficiency
August 20, 2024
The benefits of Zinc on Winter Wheat
July 9, 2024
As I travel across Canada, it has been great to see moisture along much of my path. Greener pastures and ditches in Alberta, lush spring wheat, durum, and lentil crops in Saskatchewan, as well as many triticale, grass, and alfalfa fields, are being cut from British Columbia to Nova Scotia. I do not want to forget those potatoes spread across our country along with many specialty crops. As heat and moisture have brought germination, emergence, and vegetation growth, our crop nutrient management remains a key to success as we monitor the “Points of Influence.” Crop scouting, accompanied by tissue or sap samples, supports crop-based crop protection and foliar nutrient applications. As we have been programmed to concentrate on nitrogen, we are putting a lot of pressure on one nutrient to solve many deficiencies and concerns while ignoring the balance of fertility our crops may be looking for. In this blog post, I will not cover all the nutrient requirements but concentrate a little on magnesium, as I refer to what makes plants green. This spring, a significant amount of discussion surfaced around magnesium, and several growers requested magnesium for their cropping plans. Sometimes, what is new is old; looking back, magnesium has been a big part of many crop plans for decades. In sandy soils, specialty crops, and our high calcitic soils, we are looking to balance our oxygen and moisture space in soil levels. To better understand what we are looking at, I have included a list of what Mg is responsible for as well as soil activity stated: Magnesium Crops require magnesium to capture the sun's energy for growth and production through photosynthesis. Magnesium is an essential component of the chlorophyll molecule, with each molecule containing 6.7 percent magnesium. Magnesium also acts as a phosphorus carrier in plants. Necessary for cell division and protein formation. Phosphorus uptake could not occur without magnesium, and vice versa. Magnesium is essential for phosphate metabolism, plant respiration, and the activation of several enzyme systems.